Dell Edge Gateway 5200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Edge Gateway 5200  (all builds)
MotherboardDell EGW5200
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1716 x 1153 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211109
Uptime19.4 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 15:51
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 535
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 86%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD452KI-ADL 256GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0U7JD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 185 181 179 180 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.9% Very good
Read 404
Write 324
Mixed 326
SusWrite 190
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 34.2
108% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 114
130% 220 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS2GSH64V2E-I 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.2
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 55 25 32 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback