Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 309%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory243.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 15:25
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3970X-$1,900
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 1,086
96% 816 Pts
64-Core 5423
336% 5423 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
206% Outstanding
Lighting 304
Reflection 287
Parallax 318
248% 303 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 247
Splatting 186
204% 259 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 206%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 230 187 174 148 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 445
Mixed 385
SusWrite 209
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 51.4
171% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
257GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1743 1269 1179 1161 1076 688 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,616
Write 2,437
Mixed 1,974
SusWrite 1,186
460% 2,053 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 90.3
298% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,224
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 1,091
818% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 319%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
80GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,632
Write 2,230
Mixed 1,904
501% 2,255 MB/s
4K Read 66.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 92.7
307% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,176
DQ Write 926
DQ Mixed 1,029
776% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
51GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 232 237 236 236 235 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 444
Mixed 302
SusWrite 259
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 50.2
168% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 198
147% 195 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 126 121 123 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 89.8
Write 128
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 122
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
605GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 84
Write 80.2
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 80.5
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK32GX4M1D3000C16 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
170% Outstanding
MC Read 67.9
MC Write 65.7
MC Mixed 71.2
195% 68.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 36.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 170%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 39 170 27" 1280 720 AUS2705 VG27AQL1A
Typical GA-TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 314%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $3,257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback