Asrock B450M-HDV/DX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsrock B450M-HDV/DX  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B450M-HDV/DX
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 12:38
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 188
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 584
53% 445 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia(10DE 1C83) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 37.7
31% 37.9 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 26.4
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29%
Great: 30%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ardor GAMING m.2 NVME 256Gb AL1282 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230606a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 908 304 330 325 328 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,881
Write 1,266
Mixed 1,235
SusWrite 420
267% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 31.5
138% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 239
197% 278 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 156%
Great: 276%
AGI512G17AI178 512GB
314GB free
Firmware: W0201A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 8.6 18 20 126 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 476
Write 385
Mixed 16
SusWrite 84.1
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 0.3
40% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 0.2
15% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 93%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
379GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 104 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 111
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 104
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DEXP16GD4UD32 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 9.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1920 1017 BNQ7948 BenQ EW277HDR
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback