Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 18:19
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 64
2-Core 118
46% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 188
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.3% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 79
62% 81.4 fps
MRender 78.8
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 69.8
61% 75 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM6D.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 360 369 379 151 157 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 205
Write 104
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 283
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 9.7
47% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 79.1
42% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 14.7
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.4
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 0P 3R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 14% 36 195 19 0 36.1" 1280 720 TCL5335 65S555
Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback