Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 17:27
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 64
2-Core 113
45% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 184
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61% Good
Lighting 75.3
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 78.7
61% 81.1 fps
MRender 77.8
Gravity 76
Splatting 69.4
60% 74.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM6D.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 349 354 164 137 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 409
Write 329
Mixed 321
SusWrite 237
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 27.9
121% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 173
148% 216 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 15
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 0 36.1" 1280 720 TCL5335 65S555
Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback