Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H77 Pro4/MVP  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '18 at 20:16
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 395
53% 397 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3660) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 39.1
25% 34.2 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 27.7
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 5.5
Write 118
Mixed 22.5
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.26
68% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
252GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 81.5
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.35
132% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Princeton 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77 Pro4/MVP Builds (Compare 501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP - $164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $761
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback