Dell XPS 9315

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 9315  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 02GGG1
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 04:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-1230U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 152
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 497
45% 378 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0B14) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 14.6
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 10.5
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ESE2A044-512 Phison 512GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19010008 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 531 496 405 398 535 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 901
Write 1,223
Mixed 986
SusWrite 472
202% 896 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 41
119% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 192
152% 217 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 113%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
H9JKNNNFB3AECR-N6H 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 54.6
MC Mixed 50.7
145% 50.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 25.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D44 C27F398
Typical XPS 9315 Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 9315

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback