Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA560
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210104
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '23 at 00:37
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 90.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 238 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 706 71% 576 Pts	64-Core 856 53% 856 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop) 45,297 User benchmarks, average bench 114% Device(1A58 2012) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 145 Parallax 126 108% 134 fps	MRender 145 Gravity 104 Splatting 103 94% 117 fps
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 127%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB 4,252 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,947 Write 1,187 Mixed 1470 340% 1,535 MB/s	4K Read 51.4 4K Write 96.6 4K Mixed 64 211% 70.7 MB/s	DQ Read 946 DQ Write 734 DQ Mixed 849 632% 843 MB/s
Poor: 167% Great: 297%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 130GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1188 824 748 724 694 670 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,966 Write 1,814 Mixed 1,578 SusWrite 808 345% 1,541 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 65.3 218% 73.3 MB/s	DQ Read 961 DQ Write 744 DQ Mixed 864 643% 856 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 435%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16S4B.M8FB1 2x16GB 176 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 23 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 23 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	144	15.5"	1280 720	NCP004B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	731x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	270x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	245x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	207x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	271x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	183x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $82Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	409x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	160x
TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GBUnknownBench 76%, 2,477 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16