Lenovo 30CFCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30CFCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3135
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 18:02
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 705
68% 558 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 3135) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.8 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.1
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1053 838 833 822 805 799 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,194
Write 2,017
Mixed 1,584
SusWrite 858
372% 1,663 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 67.5
219% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 569
DQ Mixed 745
548% 724 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 240%
Great: 355%
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD 1TB
407GB free
Firmware: EDFMB0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1671 356 341 339 336 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,159
Write 1,844
Mixed 1,354
SusWrite 564
278% 1,230 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 53.4
180% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 547
DQ Mixed 769
556% 725 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 168%
Great: 250%
WDC WDS200T1R0A-68A4W0 2TB
573GB free
Firmware: 411010WR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 362 380 375 425 365 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 465
Mixed 331
SusWrite 392
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 34.7
134% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 245
211% 312 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 122%
Jmicron Generic 240GB
13GB free
Firmware: 0405
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 385
Write 346
Mixed 267
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 15.3
56% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 41.2
45% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 24.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC23A PHL 275E2F
Typical 30CFCTO1WW Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30CFCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback