Asrock B760M-HDV/M.2 D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsrock B760M-HDV/M.2 D4  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B760M-HDV/M.2 D4
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 16:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 171
2-Core 339
105% 198 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 1,029
105% 847 Pts
64-Core 1,611
100% 1,611 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Palit(1569 F308) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 188
Parallax 203
167% 199 fps
MRender 280
Gravity 166
Splatting 124
148% 190 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 149%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280P4 1TB
697GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 428 510 472 472 646 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2755BS.001 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 36.9
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 29.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 31 144 27" 1920 1080 GBT2708 G27F
Typical B760M-HDV/M.2 D4 Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

System: Asrock B760M-HDV/M.2 D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback