HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AC
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 03:28
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 50.9
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 57.8
33% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 36.1
8-Core 46.4
5% 41.2 Pts
64-Core 62.6
4% 62.6 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 84AC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3501103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 260 270 253 279 243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 329
Write 275
Mixed 262
SusWrite 263
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 17.5
71% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 104
82% 115 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 151
27% 151 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 29 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE06A4
Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback