Corsair VENGEANCE i7400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCorsair VENGEANCE i7400  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO B760-VC WIFI (MS-7D98)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230620
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 03:17
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 211
2-Core 425
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 820
8-Core 1,474
138% 1,147 Pts
64-Core 2,307
143% 2,307 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 8858) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 207
Parallax 194
170% 203 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 150
Splatting 134
128% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 145%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
605GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,615
Write 2,904
Mixed 1,808
476% 2,109 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 59.7
215% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 592
377% 428 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
175% Outstanding
MC Read 73.4
MC Write 67.8
MC Mixed 64.9
196% 68.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 51.1
SC Mixed 29.9
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 175%
Great: 196%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0B80 U28D590
Typical VENGEANCE i7400 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

System: Corsair VENGEANCE i7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback