Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R920  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory53.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121211
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 20:51
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 114
50% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 393
38% 314 Pts
64-Core 817
51% 817 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.7% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 67.4
43% 60.1 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 44.7
45% 56.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 45 2.2 153 2.6 3.1 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 246
Write 282
Mixed 118
SusWrite 71.7
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 7.7
46% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 54.5
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 18.7
42% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 53
Write 25
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 28.1
25% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 29.8
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 4 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2200 F22
Typical CELSIUS R920 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback