Intel X99-P4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P4  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 20:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 181
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 581
56% 463 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 188
Parallax 204
170% 200 fps
MRender 292
Gravity 165
Splatting 124
150% 194 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 151%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 1TB SSD 1TB
915GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2207 2172 2194 2241 2263 2268 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,263
Write 2,318
Mixed 1,600
SusWrite 2,224
422% 1,851 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 56.5
182% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 540
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 440
319% 421 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 261%
Great: 272%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 8GB 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 29" 1280 720 GSM5B98 25UM58G
Typical X99-P4 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback