Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory11.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220928
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 17:45
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 173
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 472
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.44.13
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
9.37% Terrible
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 16
10% 13 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 9.8
8% 10 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.37%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1102 512GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20180000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 712 437 457 430 431 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1095
Write 1,084
Mixed 963
SusWrite 485
204% 907 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 51.7
173% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 662
494% 662 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 157%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC F4-2400C16-16GRS 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 20.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 60 15.5" 1536 793 CMN15F5
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA Builds (Compare 545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback