HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-fc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B2F
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 11:32
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 40.4
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 167
52% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 433
47% 371 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B2F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.18
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 11.6
5% 9.83 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.2
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZH 512GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 500 449 493 514 469 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 578
Write 447
Mixed 463
SusWrite 483
111% 493 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 29.2
102% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 315
224% 295 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66AK6BX070N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 118 32 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN153B
Typical Laptop 15-fc0xxx Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback