Medion Erazer P6679 MD60262

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMedion Erazer P6679 MD60262  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion D15KHN
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime17.9 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 09:40
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 143
51% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 215
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1B0A 22CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron M600 SATA M.2 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 128 86 123 112 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 368
Write 322
Mixed 317
SusWrite 133
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 25.7
74% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 204
166% 235 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 99%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
315GB free
Firmware: SAJ20104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 267 365 343 256 363 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 426
Write 378
Mixed 328
SusWrite 308
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 22.8
68% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 133
127% 200 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
378GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 94 94 90 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 88.2
Write 95.7
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 90.9
57% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 0443 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 28 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO11ED
Typical Erazer P6679 MD60262 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P6679 MD60262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback