Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory42 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181005
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 06:17
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 232
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 712
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.5% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 132
Parallax 120
98% 124 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 125
Splatting 112
91% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 306 308 308 309 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 482
Mixed 458
SusWrite 318
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 53.1
177% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A2K43CB1-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD 48GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 31.6
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 30
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 100 21.5" 1280 720 JYT2253 LED MONITOR
Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback