PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B450M-IBW (all builds) |
Memory | 18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191014 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 17 '23 at 04:05 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
54.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 31 39 23 23 11 MB/s
|
10.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Adata CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
31.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
43% | 12% | 120 | 210 | 53 | 165 | 24" | 1280 720 | AUS24AC VG248 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 112x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $89Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 58x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 29x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $311 |