HP ENVY TE01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP ENVY TE01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8653
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230211
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 23:46
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 267
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 893
83% 693 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 54
45% 55.2 fps
MRender 43.2
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 44.4
37% 45.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW010T8H 1TB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 79 558 25 14 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 1,122
Write 1,111
Mixed 59
SusWrite 162
135% 613 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 26.2
104% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 25.1
DQ Mixed 44.7
104% 234 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 101%
Great: 252%
Seagate Portable 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 121 120 120 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 90.1
Write 118
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 120
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
161% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 67%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 047e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 35 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 50
Write 32.4
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 35.3
48% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
62% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR0512 k222HQL
Typical ENVY TE01-0xxx Builds (Compare 432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TE01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback