Acer Predator GX-792

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator GX-792  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Viper2_KLS
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 12:57
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 97
2-Core 195
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 470
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1146) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (75 fps cap detected)
60.5% Good
Lighting 74
Reflection 74.6
Parallax 74.2
60% 74.3 fps
MRender 74.6
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 74.7
61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 354
Mixed 495
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 41.3
135% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 590
453% 617 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 207%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB-$77
153GB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 408 410 429 428 431 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 455
Write 392
Mixed 367
SusWrite 418
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 28.7
94% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 278
228% 325 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 17.3" 1280 720 LGD0469
Typical Predator GX-792 Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Acer Predator GX-792

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback