HP 340 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 340 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8036
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime25.3 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 00:43
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 85.5
40% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 128
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 8036) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 5.3
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 164 144 62 49 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 305
Write 279
Mixed 243
SusWrite 122
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 23.5
78% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 160
134% 196 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 118%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 152
Write 7.5
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 8.2
36% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.6
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 28 10 60 14" 1280 720 CMN1499
Typical 340 G2 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 340 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback