HP Laptop 14-bs0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8320
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220429
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 12:08
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3060
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Memory 2.8
1-Core 17.3
2-Core 13.5
6% 11.2 Pts
4-Core 21.5
8-Core 24.4
3% 23 Pts
64-Core 15.7
1% 15.7 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 8320) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 2.3
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingstonSA400S37 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 195 150 114 141 55 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.3% Poor
Read 151
Write 191
Mixed 176
SusWrite 145
38% 166 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 5
28% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 56.1
DQ Write 42.2
DQ Mixed 16.8
21% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-462.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
7.13% Terrible
MC Read 1.8
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.7
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 348
12% 348 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 4 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE0696
Typical Laptop 14-bs0xx Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-bs0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback