Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 09:03
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 75.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 286
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 969
90% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,518
94% 1,518 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 8
5% 7.63 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PNY CS3030 2TB S
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3226 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1521 1134 995 914 870 871 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,303
Write 1,706
Mixed 1,348
SusWrite 1,051
306% 1,352 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 49.8
157% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 390
336% 518 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 191%
Great: 278%
Nvme GIGABYTE GP-AG42 2TB
490GB free
Firmware: 13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1470 1420 1478 1442 1565 1425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,613
Write 1,054
Mixed 1483
SusWrite 1,467
316% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 49.4
158% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 936
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 352
311% 489 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 228%
Great: 481%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
368GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 405 414 373 355 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 382
Mixed 359
SusWrite 378
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 43.1
142% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 283
205% 271 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 134%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
639GB free
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 299 298 297 295 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 400
Write 325
Mixed 257
SusWrite 302
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 16.3
78% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 229
178% 250 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.4
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 32 30 31.5" 2560 1386 DEL42A3 DELL P3223QE
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,072
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback