Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 04:26
Run Duration422 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 220
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 613
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.2% Very good
Lighting 91
Reflection 83
Parallax 130
74% 101 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 86.7
74% 91.8 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
355GB free
Firmware: SN09844 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 362 356 368 371 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 677
Write 628
Mixed 652
SusWrite 364
130% 580 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 61.9
202% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 771
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 721
537% 713 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 144%
Great: 291%
Xraydisk 1TB PRO 1TB
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2237 2248 2272 2272 2269 2271 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 1,231
Write 2,234
Mixed 1,641
SusWrite 2,262
420% 1,842 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 67.8
220% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 752
536% 696 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 286%
Great: 334%
Fanxiang S101 512GB
442GB free
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 117 121 122 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 490
Write 411
Mixed 366
SusWrite 120
77% 347 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 12.4
112% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 16.3
70% 152 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 101%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
69GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 121 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 344
Mixed 322
SusWrite 123
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 48
168% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 168
179% 296 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 317 313 326 328 327 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 391
Write 387
Mixed 359
SusWrite 321
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 27
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 99.1
86% 129 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 99%
Walram 1 TB 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 375 373 375 374 376 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 370
Write 361
Mixed 336
SusWrite 374
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 16.1
74% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 156
121% 165 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
366GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 79 79 76 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 77.9
Write 73.8
Mixed 53
SusWrite 78.9
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 55%
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E662 1TB
304GB free
Firmware: JA0AB5D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 72 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 93.3
Write 88.4
Mixed 33
SusWrite 77.9
53% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 59%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 95 102 106 104 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 151
Write 132
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 102
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
355GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 91 90 88 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 76.3
Write 74.1
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 90
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 85.9
Write 53.3
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 51.9
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 113%
ST350041 4CS 500GB
250GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.1 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 40.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 4.2
36% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 18%
ST350041 4CS 500GB
124GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 49.8
Write 39.7
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 32.7
49% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 19.6
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 50.7" 1280 720 SAM0AC8 SAMSUNG
Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback