Bytespeed Value H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Bytespeed Value H81M-C (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H81M-C
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140616
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '23 at 19:37
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$51 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 182 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 340 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 8C91) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.2% Below average	Lighting 39.5 Reflection 61.2 Parallax 38.6 32% 46.4 fps	MRender 35.1 Gravity 39 Splatting 33.9 29% 36 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209 7,834 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: LH6i SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 140 144 145 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 308 Write 200 Mixed 230 SusWrite 139 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 30.4 112% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 92.5 97% 162 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 82%
Generic L100 Hard drive 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 108GB free Firmware: MU2OA7M0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 85 79 88 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 90.7 Write 108 Mixed 29 SusWrite 81.4 56% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1144 HKED3081BAB3H3SA1 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.7% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 18 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 17.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	4	211	54	60	20"	1280 720	HWP299F HP W2072a

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Value H81M-C Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Bytespeed Value H81M-C

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	38x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	32x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	27x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	25x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	23x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	8x
T253512GB 512GBTeamBench 82%, 3,987 samples	7x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	9x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16