Thunderobot 911MT

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Thunderobot 911MT (all builds)
Motherboard	THUNDEROBOT V158PNX-HL
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220616
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '23 at 15:55
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12450H 9,550 User benchmarks, average bench 89% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Memory 71.4 1-Core 182 2-Core 342 104% 198 Pts	4-Core 655 8-Core 904 98% 780 Pts	64-Core 1,098 68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Clevo(1558 0155) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4601 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.1% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 163 Parallax 110 96% 130 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 90.7 Splatting 83.4 82% 104 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CL5-8D512 512GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 140% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: EX92101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 698 873 134 135 135 135 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 1,155 Write 930 Mixed 1,005 SusWrite 352 192% 860 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 52 204% 80.9 MB/s	DQ Read 669 DQ Write 1,002 DQ Mixed 645 542% 772 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 208%
Phison SU30 240GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 215GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 32 32 32 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.7% Very poor	Read 58.5 Write 30.9 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 31.4 9% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 9.5 34% 8.93 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB 38,732 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 35.7 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 36.5 SC Mixed 24.9 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	144	15.5"	1536 801	BOE0910

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 911MT Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Thunderobot 911MT

CPU
Core i5-12450HIntelBench 89%, 9,550 samples	28x
Gen Intel Core i5-11260H11thBench 72%, 2,929 samples	16x
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	11x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples	21x
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 38,648 samples	12x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	10x

SSD
CL4-8D512 512GBSsstcBench 239%, 159 samples	26x
CL5-8D512 512GBSsstcBench 140%, 158 samples	18x
CL1-8D512 512GBSsstcBench 138%, 779 samples	14x

RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	25x
Tiger TMKS8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GBKingBench 93%, 74 samples	7x
M471A1K43CB1-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 90%, 3,469 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16