Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 19:10
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$277
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 82.4
1-Core 214
2-Core 417
123% 238 Pts
4-Core 827
8-Core 1,607
144% 1,217 Pts
64-Core 2,875
178% 2,875 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 407B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 125
Parallax 128
111% 130 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 107
Splatting 92.7
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1238 1048 1020 993 963 952 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,866
Write 3,216
Mixed 1,736
SusWrite 1,036
496% 2,214 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 239
4K Mixed 74.7
302% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 2,049
DQ Write 1,240
DQ Mixed 1,316
1,068% 1,535 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 342%
Great: 442%
Aitc FZKM SSD 1TB
80GB free
Firmware: 2107XKR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1548
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,004
293% 1,320 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 249
4K Mixed 26.8
229% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 503
497% 784 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 230%
Seagate ST6000NM0024-1HT17Z 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 201 204 203 202 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 206
Mixed 105
SusWrite 203
132% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.2
270% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 117%
Great: 119%
WD WD40PURX-85TTDY0 1 4TB
475GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 110 109 109 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.2% Good
Read 100
Write 134
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 110
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
24GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 134 135 148 129 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 146
Mixed 32
SusWrite 139
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 107%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 64GB
36GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 54.3
Write 32.5
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 37.2
47% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.6
98% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG16GX4M1E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1920 1009 DELD07A DELL S2216H
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 3,671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $825
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback