Acer Veriton X6640G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton X6640G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton X6640G
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 18:01
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 393
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 31.2
27% 34.2 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 29.3
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TDL-1AW1ZABHA 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 355 220 215 220 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 378
Write 356
Mixed 328
SusWrite 250
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 35.2
118% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 323
236% 306 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 17.5
15% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5ABB LG FULL HD
Typical Veriton X6640G Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton X6640G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback