Intel X79-SERVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel X79
MotherboardIntel X79-SERVER  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210222
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 16:54
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2651 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 41.2
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 95
35% 61 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 375
33% 282 Pts
64-Core 1,590
98% 1,590 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 55.8
46% 56.1 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 49.9
43% 53.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 360 416 420 424 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 470
Write 377
Mixed 342
SusWrite 403
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 22
80% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 132
114% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.2% Good
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 25.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 21 60 23.5" 1920 1017 PHLC102 PHL 257E7
Typical X79-SERVER Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Intel X79-SERVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback