Fujitsu UH-X

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Fujitsu UH-X (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB2E0
Memory	5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230630
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '23 at 12:06
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1165G7 51,565 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 61.4 1-Core 129 2-Core 211 74% 134 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 502 50% 409 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(1E26 0050) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4824 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 27.2 Parallax 25.3 18% 24.9 fps	MRender 22.2 Gravity 27.5 Splatting 13.2 16% 21 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00007 1TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 746GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 197 131 160 150 167 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 736 Write 54.4 Mixed 200 SusWrite 156 62% 287 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 61.3 4K Mixed 26.1 97% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 496 DQ Write 93.2 DQ Mixed 339 237% 309 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 201%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB 1,024 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 58.2 MC Mixed 41.4 131% 45.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 14.6 54% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	3	60	13.3"	1536 864	SHP1531 LQ133M1JW48A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical UH-X Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu UH-X

CPU
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples	21x
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples	19x
Core i5-1235UIntelBench 60%, 8,532 samples	8x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	40x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 13%, 18,007 samples	12x
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	1x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBQNPZ-512G-1016 512GBWDCBench 157%, 75 samples	15x
MZVLQ1T0HALB-00007 1TBSamsungBench 142%, 38 samples	12x
MZVLQ512HALU-00007 512GBSamsungBench 129%, 133 samples	11x

RAM
8x2GBMicronBench 117%, 968 samples	20x
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GBSamsungBench 117%, 1,024 samples	17x
H9HCNNNCPMBLHR-NEE 8x2GBHynixBench 114%, 25 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369