Fujitsu UH-X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemFujitsu UH-X  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2E0
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 12:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 61.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 211
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 502
50% 409 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E26 0050) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4824
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 25.3
18% 24.9 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 13.2
16% 21 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00007 1TB
746GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 197 131 160 150 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 736
Write 54.4
Mixed 200
SusWrite 156
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 26.1
97% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 496
DQ Write 93.2
DQ Mixed 339
237% 309 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 58.2
MC Mixed 41.4
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 14.6
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 13.3" 1536 864 SHP1531 LQ133M1JW48A
Typical UH-X Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu UH-X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback