Acer Predator PO3-630

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-630  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-630
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 09:05
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 72.5
1-Core 165
2-Core 325
98% 188 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,136
103% 866 Pts
64-Core 1,352
84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Sapphire(174B A630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.80
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 117
Parallax 124
107% 124 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 102
Splatting 86.9
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2370
Write 2,291
Mixed 1708
473% 2,123 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 71.8
244% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,334
DQ Write 979
DQ Mixed 1,068
822% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 322%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
761GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 484
Write 458
Mixed 416
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 62.9
207% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 337
253% 337 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S8HD-8F KF3200C16D4/8GX ACR32D4U2S8HD-8F KF3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 2400, 3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 28.6" 1280 720 SAM1017 LU28R55
Typical Predator PO3-630 Builds (Compare 3,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO3-630

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback