Lenovo 43518G0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 43518G0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 01:51
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 186
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 700
65% 542 Pts
64-Core 939
58% 939 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3700 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 115
Parallax 131
102% 124 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 115
Splatting 108
109% 138 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
507GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1279 1271 1267 1273 1262 1252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,215
Write 2,073
Mixed 1,903
SusWrite 1,268
419% 1,865 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 47.9
162% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 358
265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 232%
Great: 633%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- 64GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 48.6
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 41.5
127% 44.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24" 1280 720 ACR078F KA242Y A
Typical 43518G0 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 43518G0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $995
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback