Acer Swift SF314-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Swift SF314-44  (all builds)
MotherboardBCU Dolphin_BCU
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 00:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 70.4
1-Core 165
2-Core 324
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,116
104% 868 Pts
64-Core 1,204
74% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1620) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.32
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 33.5
20% 25.3 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 22.4
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1375 1024 373 380 382 382 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,789
Write 1,455
Mixed 1,188
SusWrite 652
284% 1271 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 29.4
130% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,001
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 722
574% 809 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 188%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 27.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 14" 1280 720 BOE099B
Typical Swift SF314-44 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SF314-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback