Asrock X99 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 21:08
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 677
66% 543 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Gigabyte(1458 400D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 158
Parallax 178
132% 166 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 138
Splatting 121
120% 152 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
730GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1654 1420 1398 1425 1446 1421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,239
Write 1,991
Mixed 1,574
SusWrite 1,461
407% 1,816 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 55.8
179% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 486
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 405
298% 396 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 252%
Great: 410%
ST16000NM000J-2T 16TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 112 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 186
Write 192
Mixed 212
SusWrite 111
40% 175 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 1
72% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 4.4
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 0.3
3% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 52%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
52GB free
Firmware: 6B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 450 463 457 457 414 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 449
Mixed 335
SusWrite 449
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 35.4
120% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 171
177% 290 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 116%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
461GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 89 92 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 92.4
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 88.6
69% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 24.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 22.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 56.4
71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 24" 1280 720 SAM0A28 S24C300
Typical X99 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback