Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-HD3  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560x1440x4294967296 szín, 1024x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime19.3 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 17:47
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$129
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 185
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 508
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.9% Very good
Lighting 89.2
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 82.3
73% 86.1 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 76.9
Splatting 70.6
68% 84.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 631 215 300 268 269 266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 874
Write 805
Mixed 492
SusWrite 325
139% 624 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 42.9
141% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 412
322% 449 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 120%
Great: 313%
Kingston SUV100S37A120G 120GB
45GB free
Firmware: S8FM06.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 191 190 191 192 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 486
Write 197
Mixed 187
SusWrite 190
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 12.5
65% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 36
37% 61.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
332GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 148 149 147 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 116
Write 120
Mixed 64
SusWrite 147
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2X4G64CB88D9N-DG 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 1311 M2X4G64CB88D9N-DG 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical GA-H87-HD3 Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback