Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-HD3  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560x1440x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 14:18
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$129
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 168
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 473
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.8% Very good
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 85.2
Parallax 80
73% 85 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 79
Splatting 70.4
69% 86.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 119 135 135 143 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 824
Write 670
Mixed 478
SusWrite 174
119% 536 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 43.2
138% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 416
324% 451 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 108%
Great: 313%
Kingston SUV100S37A120G 120GB
30GB free
Firmware: S8FM06.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 189 193 194 196 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 469
Write 196
Mixed 187
SusWrite 190
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 11.9
64% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 46.3
DQ Mixed 36.1
37% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
332GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 146 143 146 145 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 111
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 144
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2X4G64CB88D9N-DG 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 1311 M2X4G64CB88D9N-DG 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.8% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 9 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical GA-H87-HD3 Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback