Novatech P65_67HSHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNovatech P65_67HSHP  (all builds)
MotherboardNovatech P65_67HSHP
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161202
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 187
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 478
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 67A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 60.6
47% 62.6 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 62
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 37 31 36 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 165 163 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,595
Write 737
Mixed 671
SusWrite 174
174% 794 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 53.5
175% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 663
507% 690 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 160%
Great: 234%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 73 82 76 75 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 23.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 190 10 75 17.3" 1920 1017 LGD046C
Typical P65_67HSHP Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Novatech P65_67HSHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback