Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211103
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 12:58
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$104
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 169
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 533
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 8854) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 97.6
Parallax 90.1
80% 95.1 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 90.1
Splatting 75.9
74% 92.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: T0506A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 345
Mixed 334
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 20.8
93% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 33.1
78% 160 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 95%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
781GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,363
Write 1,721
Mixed 1,540
346% 1,541 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 58.9
189% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 672
DQ Mixed 763
570% 759 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
466GB free
Firmware: JC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 69.3
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
AI Mass Storage 8GB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 1.7
6% 5.63 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 25.8
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 20.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2787 VG27VQ
Typical GA-B560M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 3,096 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback