HP Pro x360 Fortis 11 inch G10 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro x360 Fortis 11 inch G10 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89B1
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 20:30
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-1230U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 45
1-Core 142
2-Core 207
71% 131 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 242
27% 213 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 89B1) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4952
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.93 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E2m2 64GB 62GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10100080
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 171 178 182 189 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 251
Write 195
Mixed 219
SusWrite 166
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 17.2
79% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 40.9
35% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 287%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 661%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3UH5H50AM-JGCR 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 11.6" 1280 720 AUOA199
Typical Pro x360 Fortis 11 inch G10 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro x360 Fortis 11 inch G10 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback