Asus N752VX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N752VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N752VX
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160722
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 07:28
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 157
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 468
46% 377 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 10A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 6.3
4% 6.03 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.7
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP550NS38 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0414B
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 406
Write 330
Mixed 318
264% 351 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 20.3
3,290% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 79.5
1,120% 168 MB/s
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
515GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 121 119 124 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 121
Write 102
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 121
67% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD04E8
Typical N752VX Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N752VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback