bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory19.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 19.7GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory15 GB free of 19.6953 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1848 x 952 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 22:09
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-1235U
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.9% Poor
Memory 12.5
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 173
38% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 232
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 9.17.6.3
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 18.9
7% 12.1 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 12
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 86GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 962
Write 788
Mixed 1,054
209% 934 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 22.5
78% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 151
118% 164 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 142%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB Virtual RAM VMW-128MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB Virtual RAM VMW-8MB 19GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 2048, 1024, 512, 128, 64, 8 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 1.1
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 318
13% 318 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 45 60 0" 1848 881 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback