Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 10:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 225
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 550
59% 469 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$499
Nvidia(10DE 2786) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 263
Reflection 264
Parallax 277
215% 268 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 239
Splatting 193
207% 264 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 190%
Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 438 438 459 458 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 460
Mixed 323
SusWrite 448
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 37.9
135% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 161
147% 217 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 61 24.1" 1280 720 NFC0224 VCB1079H
Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback