Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 06:20
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 526
53% 429 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 117
Parallax 155
135% 146 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
116% 147 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 204 232 247 248 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71% Very good
Read 210
Write 168
Mixed 223
SusWrite 218
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 36.7
136% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 142
114% 158 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71%
Great: 102%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
25GB free
Firmware: 96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 110 59 57 56 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.7% Good
Read 254
Write 248
Mixed 224
SusWrite 79.1
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 39.4
140% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 143
120% 173 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
17GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 85 94 93 97 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 270
Write 122
Mixed 149
SusWrite 91.2
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 40.1
146% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 93.5
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 101
78% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
253GB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 90 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 104
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 89.9
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
179GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 155 150 144 153 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 143
Write 66.4
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 148
71% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
111% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 107%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
90GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 79 79 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 79.3
Write 76.3
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 78.2
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 60 27" 1966 1106 SAM0F56 C27JG5x
Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback