Asrock Z370 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 20:04
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 464
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42BEU1TB Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,183
Write 1,727
Mixed 1,540
403% 1,817 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 62.5
200% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 735
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 629
460% 607 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 372%
Micron MTFDHBA256TCK 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 005P1LN
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,210
Write 965
Mixed 783
219% 986 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 46.5
146% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 740
DQ Write 585
DQ Mixed 607
469% 644 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 210%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
280GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 167
Write 150
Mixed 80.6
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-4GVR 04CD F4-2400C15-4GVR 04CD F4-2400C17-8GNT 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Z370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Pro4 - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback