Lenovo 81SS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81SS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 18:22
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 193
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 479
47% 385 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.15021.11005
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 11
Parallax 17.4
10% 13.6 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1018 855 855 873 875 877 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,944
Write 1,684
Mixed 1,466
SusWrite 892
335% 1,496 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 48.6
194% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 935
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 768
584% 793 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 227%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 19
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1920 1080
Typical 81SS Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81SS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback