Acer Aspire V3-575T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V3-575T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Usopp_SL
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150925
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 03:21
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 132
51% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 192
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1030) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4599
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 5.6
5% 5.5 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 403
Write 367
Mixed 318
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 26.7
87% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 158
155% 250 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
81GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 33.8
Write 15
Mixed 14.2
23% 21 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.7
73% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD04EA
Typical Aspire V3-575T Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-575T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback