Asus ZN242IFD

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus ZN242IFD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ZN242IFD
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171012
Uptime	22.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '23 at 17:05
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1151p, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 79.9 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 129 59% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 260 29% 228 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 1C00) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.46 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Lighting 27 Reflection 28.1 Parallax 24.8 22% 26.6 fps	MRender 31.8 Gravity 21.2 Splatting 17.5 18% 23.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 271GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 600 592 591 586 582 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 1,355 Write 1,240 Mixed 720 SusWrite 603 219% 980 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 40 132% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 271 200% 268 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 259%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 156GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 84 84 83 76 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 105 Write 118 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 82.6 68% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 134% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.D305G.D390B 2x16GB 215 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	69.4% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 24.5 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 19.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	53	22	60	72.3"	1280 720	___9000 LCD TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZN242IFD Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Asus ZN242IFD

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	23x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	41x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	14x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	12x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	2x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	11x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GBHynixBench 48%, 3,269 samples	11x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16