Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 20:53
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$125
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 435
51% 393 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 115
Parallax 103
84% 107 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 103
Splatting 103
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 883 DCT 1.92TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXT7404Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 406 443 458 459 456 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 446
Mixed 405
SusWrite 401
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 33.5
106% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 371
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 119%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$363
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 416 453 469 470 467 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 448
Mixed 435
SusWrite 410
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 48.5
157% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 111%
Great: 137%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
416GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 57.2
Write 22.8
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 26.2
39% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1
55% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 25" 1280 720 DEL413D DELL U2518D
Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback