Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 20:12
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$184
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 154
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 395
43% 339 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 97
Reflection 110
Parallax 100
79% 102 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 100
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 883 DCT 1.92TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXT7404Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 375 419 431 433 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 418
Mixed 393
SusWrite 394
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 33.5
112% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 371
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 119%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$374
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 389 433 443 448 436 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 434
Mixed 417
SusWrite 406
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 50.5
161% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 367
276% 368 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 111%
Great: 137%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
416GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 55.5
Write 24.7
Mixed 24
SusWrite 27.2
40% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1
62% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 25" 1280 720 DEL413D DELL U2518D
Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback